My final chart is the Final Word on the Global Warming & Carbon Dioxide Myth.

A climate theory/model needs real positive observations to prove it to be a fact - this has not happened with the Global Warming via Carbon Dioxide theory/model - on the contrary, real observations are negative. Global Warming via carbon dioxide is merely a myth, but some so called climate scientists cannot let go, they insist on keeping the myth as a belief, much like a religious belief, which everyone must believe without question - without proof.

It is a myth that carbon dioxide controls temperature of this planet. Take a look at the five hundred year period from 1050 to 1550 AD. The green curve is carbon dioxide and the brown curve is Global Temperature. Carbon dioxide is moving in a steady path sideways. If CO2 controls temperature, then temperature should also be going in a steady path sideways, but it is not, it is wandering up and down.

Take a look at the year 1600 AD, where carbon dioxide comes down and temperature goes up. If carbon dioxide is the main cause of Global Temperature, then why is temperature going up when carbon dioxide is going down? The answer to that question is very simple. Any change of carbon dioxide has little if any influence on Global Warming, but you do not need to accept only these two examples as proof, there is the coup de grace, the rise of carbon dioxide after the year 1750 AD, a nice big rise - right? Right indeed, that rise is man-made carbon dioxide, the big bogeyman the so called climate scientists have been ranting about. Man-made carbon dioxide has caused CO2 levels to rise as much in the last two hundred years as they have risen in the twenty thousand years before, a period starting in the low part of the last ice age, but this great big spike in CO2 has not resulted in a spike of Global temperatures, which don't even break out of the range of temperatures in which global temperatures have been wandering within while going sideways for the last ten thousand years.

One would think that if CO2 did control temperature and with such a big spike of CO2, that temperature would also spike up, but temperature has yet to even break out of its peak of 60.91 F degrees, the Red Line. This chart is the final word on the debate about CO2 causing temperature to rise, and that word is that CO2 has little if any influence on the rise of temperature - no more needs to be said?

This method of math used to plot these two curves clearly reveals the influence of man-made carbon dioxide on the level of carbon dioxide, but it also tells us that this influence has no effect on Global Warming, which is the answer to the big question: Is man made carbon dioxide causing Global Warming?

It is interesting to note that Global Temperature reached its lowest value before carbon dioxide and then Global Temperature reached its highest value again before carbon dioxide, it seems that carbon dioxide lags behind temperature under natural conditions, which it does by several hundred years when they are both rising up. I am not the first to make this observation, for example, at http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/vostokco2.html we find the following quote: "High-resolution records from Antarctic ice cores show that carbon dioxide concentrations increased by 80 to 100 parts per million by volume 600 +/- 400 years after the warming of the last three deglaciations."

The charts in Section Two show that carbon dioxide does lag behind temperature, but then carbon dioxide does catch up and after 1750 AD goes well above temperature on the charts under the unnatural condition of man-made carbon dioxide.

The Melting of Ice and Sea Levels Something needs to be said about melting ice and the resultant rising sea levels. I have read that if all the ice in the world were to melt, sea levels would rise twenty to thirty meters, but all the ice is not going to melt - because every time temperatures wander down, ice is formed to replace the ice that was melted when temperatures were in the high side of its wandering range. Proof of this is the fact that we still have ice. The average temperature must just happen to be at the point where ice will be maintained. If the average temperature was a bit higher so that the cold part of a cycle could not replace the melted ice in the warm part of a cycle, then after a number of cycles, all the ice would be melted during each warm spell, but this is not the case we face at the present time of 2006, because if so, then all the ice would now be melted. Currently, temperatures and sea levels have been inching up, but this will come to an end because it has always come to an end the many times in the last eleven thousand years that it has happened. There is no current reason to believe that it will not come to an end this time, regardless of what the climate clowns are saying. There is no evidence that would indicate temperatures will break out of their wandering range of 54 to 60 F degrees. Even if it does break the sixty degree top of the range that does not mean run-a-way heating of our earth, it only means a higher average temperature and more melting of ice. but that is unlikely because whatever force is currently heating our planet, it is a constant force and unlikely to increase.

The only point to consider is that when mankind burns fossil fuels, he not only adds CO2 to the air, he is also adding additional heat units. So far, I have not been able to see this additional heat in the temperature readings, but if the temperature does inch above sixty-one F degrees, my thinking would be that would be the result of these additional heat units.

September 24, 2007 - First Photo of the first Action Without Reaction Device:

Photo taken on September 24, 2007 in Michigan, United States

What you are looking at is the first working device that produces a force in a controlled direction and then reduces the counter force in the opposite direction to less than ten percent. The result is action with very little reaction. Believe that this device works, I have had this device moving along my driveway on casters.

Action With Reduced Reaction There is a law of physics that states: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The absolute obedience to this law has prevented space science from developing a means of pushing space vehicles without using some sort of rocket type action, that is, until now. I have discovered a new and useful process by which an electrical powered mechanical device can be made that will yield action with reduced reaction. The net result is action without the required reaction. In other words mankind can now bypass this law of physics when it is useful to do so.

Section One What's happening now with Global Temperatures and Carbon Dioxide - Plotting
Temperature and Carbon Dioxide Together:

Section Two Are we near the end of our current temperature rise?

Section Three Five Global Warmings in 420,000 Years

Section Four Nineteen Thousand years of our current Global Warming

Section Five The final chart and word on Global Warming

Section Six Wrap Up on Global Warming

Hockey Stick The Fabrication of Global Warming Evidence 2/25/07

Hurricanes The Global Cooling of Global Warming by Storms:
Copy of August 22, 2006 - `Cane Mutiny (The Mutiny of the Hurricanes due to cooler oceans)
A new scientific article now accepted for publication in Geophysical Research Letters shows that the globally averaged upper ocean cooled dramatically between 2003 and 2005, effectively erasing 20% of the warming that occurred over the previous 48 years! - Cooler Oceans Mean a Cooler Planet.

Al Gore He's Back with a new book, a movie, a website, a lecture tour, and of course, the infamous Hockey Stick Chart.

NOVA/PBS The Credibility of NOVA & PBS is at Stake.

Sanity Public doesn't warm to the doom and gloom of the Carbon Global Warming Clowns.